Manual connect bitcomet

If they only have 1 torrent which has a small peer list, or worse yet a peer list of ONE, then even if BitComet abides by a relatively low half open connection limit of The limiting factor would then ironically! You mean the DoS like connecting was fixed in 0. Switeck, only connections per second?

Your BC-friend is slow. Nah, I don't know about hammering being fixed -- I'm just saying that I haven't seen it in action yet.

I guess I just never noticed it before because I rotate ports occasionally. Also any ip that would hammer that hard tends to quickly download the torrent and leave. And BitComet's users need to configure their client:. This isn't a manual connect button they're pounding on to cause this "hostile-like" effect. This is automated, goes for HOURS on end, and can progressively create "ghost" connections stuck in a half closed state.

I've seen it too many times to assume it's accidental. That the BitComet client not only allows such behavior I gave BitComet a run on my box before I formatted, mostly to just try seeding my existing torrents. I've got an outgoing encrypted connection to one This looks to be either a fake, possibly Thunderbolt, or a modded version of BC. There were a few "patches" floating around for BitComet.

Others messed with internal settings. BitComet 1. See above for examples! BitComet may allow multiple connections per ip, either by default or by a settings change. I believe there's even a setting similar to that in uTorrent's advanced settings. I had an outgoing encrypted connection to that BitComet client, so MY port wouldn't match up with an incoming attempt on my ip BitComet may not recognize that it was already connected to me for that reason.

The reason why the incoming connection is unencrypted is probably due to default settings as well Really though, it should probably do the reverse. Most of them were too stupid to use anything else.

My favorites were the ones using old rumors as their defense. None of them liked being told how they were wrong. The above posts pretty much said it all. However, uTorrent's measures of countering BC or maybe it is just general aggressiveness have been getting better over time. Either that or BC is cheating less than before. By now, I'd say you should give a serious shot at just going pure-uT, no "priming" or the like is necessary.

However, I disagree with stuffing the BC guys on a regular basis. In my experience, BC guys constitute both the best and the worst peers.

Those "best" guys make up any crime committed by the rest of the swarm. All when my UL flanks at 55 while DLing. Since you probably aren't complaining when this happens, I think it a wee-bit hypocritical to ban them afterwards.

Just searching torrent , utorrent. Too bad it comes ranks in the hundreds when you search bittorrent That's you. For me, recently, BC does not give me appreciable advantage. That was when I stopped priming. That's what I hate about Google. It never seems to work properly eg. It depends on what is going on. At the moment I switch between two regex settings and now that I have some time I'm working on some better ones. BitComet Accelerator is the finest software of its kind for BitComet network clients.

This easy-to-use and efficient plug-in uses our newest technology that can double the speed of any download. It was designed to help you by boosting download of large files, such as full albums, movies, TV shows, games, and applications.

Plus, it automatically finds more source faster then BitComet original program. Small and easy to use and NO spyware integrated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options Does it actually work? I have yet to try it out myself. Thought of waiting for others to comment. Hehe :D. Copernic Reporter Posted July 12, Spyware inside! HellBender Posted July 12, K Posted July 12, BS if you ask me. Let's give a clap to HellBender! No spyware they say? Ferret Posted July 12, My definitions are dated the 8th July , and says that they are the most up-to-date.

Ar3s Posted July 12,