Automatic license plate recognition cameras

However, these laws vary from country to country. The strictness of GDPR and the high penalties ensure that companies collecting sensitive data handle it with utmost security. License plate information, an image of a vehicle, and a facial snapshot are all deemed highly-sensitive personal information and thus protected by GDPR. Adaptive Recognition started manufacturing GDPR-compliant solutions even before the regulations came into effect, and it has continued this practice ever since.

The same applies to our ANPR cameras — especially models running license plate recognition — whether they are used for access control, traffic monitoring, or speed and traffic enforcement.

The U. The law also prohibits public agencies from selling, sharing, or transferring ALPR data except to other public agencies. EFF has coordinated volunteers to collect ALPR policies across the state of California and to expose agencies failing to comply with the law. EFF has also independently filed public records requests with dozens of agencies to shine light on their use of ALPR data. EFF investigated more than ALPR cameras operated by law enforcement that were leaking data because of misconfiguration.

These cameras were inadvertently publicly accessible through web browsers and Telnet interfaces. We have also contacted public safety agencies whose ALPR data was exposed online, often on websites accessible to anyone with a web browser, to responsibly disclose the security vulnerabilities we found.

Neal v. Fairfax County Police Department. San Francisco—On Friday, Jan. Washington, D. The Electronic Frontier Alliance is made up of more than seventy groups of concerned community members, often including workers in the tech industry who see issues of the industry from the inside.

The dystopian technology the patents describe are exploitative and dehumanizing. And if the companies transformed their patents into real products, the technology would You can read more about the role of patents in this Join EFF Lists.

Electronic Frontier Foundation. Podcast Episode Privacy info. This embed will serve content from youtube-nocookie. Related Updates. Securus and GTL have spent the last several years inventing new and improved ways to extract money from incarcerated people, violate human rights, and surveil not only prisoners but their families, and friends. Over the next two weeks we will be shedding light on some of the patents and technologies Follow EFF: twitter facebook instagram youtube flicker rss.

Common Use Cases. Smart Cities. Gated Entry. Deployment Environments Sighthound ALPR is available for deployment in the cloud, on-premise, or within edge devices including in-vehicle cameras and digital signage. On Premise. Edge Devices. Windows OS. Vision Capabilities. Accuracy based on Caltech Car Dataset. License plate data may be collected and accessed only for a law enforcement purpose. The data must be destroyed no later than 30 months after it was originally collected unless the data are the subject matter of a toll violation or for a law enforcement purpose.

Allows sharing of captured license plate data among law enforcement agencies. Law enforcement agencies deploying an automated license plate recognition system must maintain policies for the use and operation of the system, including but not limited to policies for the training of law enforcement officers in the use of captured license plate data License plate data collected by a law enforcement agency is not subject to public disclosure.

Prohibits the use of automatic license plate recognition systems except for certain public safety purposes. Provides that data collected is confidential and may be used only for law enforcement purposes. Data collected may not be stored more than 21 days. Provides that data gathered by an automatic license plate reader system are not subject to disclosure under the Public Information Act. Relates to data practices; classifies data and provides procedures related to automated license plate readers; provides the data that may be collected by such readers; relates to requirements for the sharing of such data among law enforcement agencies; requires the maintenance of a public log recording the uses of such data; requires related records maintenance and the auditing of such records; requires written procedures governing access to the data; requires certain notification when setting up readers.

Requires any governmental entity that uses an automatic license plate reader ALPR system to adopt a policy governing use of the system. Governmental entities also must adopt a privacy policy to ensure that captured plate data is not shared in violation of this act or any other law.

Provides that captured plate data is not considered a public record. Restricts the use of automated license plate readers to local, county and state law enforcement officers, who shall only use the devices subject to specified conditions and limitations and for specified purposes. Provides that records of number plates read shall not be recorded or transmitted anywhere and shall be purged from the system within 3 minutes of their capture, unless the number resulted in an arrest, a citation or protective custody or identified a vehicle that was the subject of a missing or wanted person broadcast.

Requires state or local law enforcement agencies to adopt a written policy governing the use of an ALPR system that addresses databases used to compare data obtained by the system, data retention and sharing of data with other law enforcement agencies, system operator training, supervision of system use, and data security and access.

Requires audits and reports of system use and effectiveness. Limits retention of ALPR data to no more than 90 days, except in specified circumstances. Provides that data obtained by the system is confidential and not a public record.